ABSTRACT
Objectives: Varenox is the first locally manufactured and approved biosimilar in Algeria. It is an enoxaparin sodium (ES) with established good analytical characterization and manufacturing quality control. The aim of the PROPHYVAR study was to generate real-life data in routine practices and to assess the safety and tolerability in the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Method(s): This is an observational, prospective, multicenter study, conducted between April 2021 and May 2022. The primary safety outcome was the incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) related to the study drug. A sample size of 500 patients was calculated to estimate the proportion of patients with AEs. Assuming that approximately 10% will be lost to follow-up or not evaluable, 550 patients were needed to describe the impact of Varenox use. Result(s): The study was conducted in 25 different sites in Algeria, in 4 therapeutic areas: ICU, orthopedic surgery, obstetrics and nephrology;550 patients were included and received at least one injection of Varenox. The mean age was 47 years, women in majority (62.5%). The patients were overweight or obese (53%), with a history of arterial hypertension (25%), diabetes (7.5%) and renal failure (6.4%). Reasons for hospitalization were mainly fracture (15.5%), pregnancy (8.3%), COVID-19 (7%) or cancer (7%). The majority of patients were treated at prophylactic dose of 0.4ml (80%) or 0.6ml (10%). The median duration of follow-up was 24 days. A total of 38 patients experienced at least one AE (6.9%, CI95=[4.9%;9.4%]). Related AEs were reported in 10 patients (1.8%), mainly in nephrology (N=7 arterio-venous fistula). VTE events were reported in 6 patients (1.1%, CI95=[0.2%;2%]). Conclusion(s): This study suggests that Varenox is safe in the prophylaxis of VTE. To our knowledge this is the first large study describing the use of ES in current medical practice in Algeria.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Objective: The impact of social media on public health has been examined in various studies. However, none have explored user engagement based on the type of Facebook posts related to renal disease. Therefore, the present study sought to determine which type of nephrology-related posts have greater user engagement. Setting(s): Facebook pages. Method(s): The posts on a specific Facebook page curated by a team of nephrologists in Malaysia were examined in this cross-sectional study. The type of post, likes, comments, shares of a post and reach of a post were used for data analysis. Analysis of variance was used to quantify the relative contribution of each independent variable to the odds of the post being highly liked or shared. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare links, photos, shared videos, status and videos for parameters such as reach, the number of times a specific piece of content has been displayed on a screen (impressions), and user engagement. Result(s): Shared videos and photos received the highest median reach of 5,862 and 5,880, respectively. People who 'liked' the page in 2019, 2020 and 2021 numbered 193, 4,196 and 2,835, respectively. Among the types of content on the Facebook page, photos and shared videos received the highest median lifetime reach of the post compared to links, status and videos in terms of 'people who liked the page'. Conclusion(s): The study findings suggest that posting a video or photo maximises the chance of engagement and meaningfully impacts public health outcomes.Copyright © The Author(s) 2023.
ABSTRACT
Background: We previously described a nephrology-specific "Breaking Bad News" Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) assessing nephrology fellow communication and counseling skills in 3 scenarios: kidney replacement therapy (KRT) in kidney failure, urgent KRT in acute kidney injury (AKI), and kidney biopsy (KBx). Objective: The main objectives of this study is to adapt the OSCE to a virtual platform, simulating nephrology patient telemedicine encounters involving difficult conversations, and to assess fellow and faculty satisfaction with the virtual format. Design: Description of a formative telemedicine simulation for nephrology fellows. Setting: Fully virtual simulation conducted by 2 academic medical simulation centers. Participants: Nephrology faculty and fellows at 3 urban/suburban training programs in the eastern United States. Measurements: Description of the virtual OSCE process. Fellow and faculty satisfaction overall and for each scenario. Faculty and fellow estimates of frequency of virtual patient encounters in the past year. Methods: The OSCE consisted of 3 scenarios: KRT in kidney failure, urgent KRT in AKI, and KBx. Objective Structured Clinical Examinations were administered in May 2021. Each scenario lasted 20 minutes. The AKI scenario was audio only. Fellows telephoned a simulated patient surrogate for urgent KRT consent. Kidney failure and KBx scenarios were video encounters. Faculty observed while muted/video off. Immediately after the OSCE, fellows and faculty were anonymously surveyed regarding their satisfaction with each scenario, the OSCE overall, and their estimate of outpatient encounters and inpatient KRT counseling done virtually in the preceding year. Results: Seventeen fellows completed the OSCE at 2 centers (3 programs). Sixteen (94%) completed the survey. Almost 94% rated the OSCE as a good/very good approximation of telemedicine encounters. Those satisfied/very satisfied with each scenario are as follow: 100% for AKI, 75% for kidney failure, and 75% for KBx. Two commented that they often did urgent KRT counseling by telephone. Fellows estimated a median 20% (interquartile range: 175, 50%) of counseling for acute inpatient KRT and a median 50% (IQR: 33.75, 70%) of outpatient encounters were virtual in the prior year. Two (regarding the kidney failure and KBx scenarios) indicated they would not have counseled similar outpatients virtually. Limitations: The 15-minute interactions may be too short to allow the encounter to be completed comfortably. A small number of programs and fellows participated, and programs were located in urban/suburban areas on the east coast of the United States. Conclusions: Overall, fellows felt that the OSCE was a good approximation of virtual encounters. The OSCE is an opportunity for fellows to practice telemedicine communication skills.
Contexte: Nous avions précédemment décrit un examen clinique objectif structuré (ECOS) de type « annonce d'une mauvaise nouvelle ¼ en néphrologie afin d'évaluer les compétences en communication et consultation des résidents en néphrologie. L'ECOS comportait trois scénarios: thérapie de remplacement rénal (TRR) pour l'insuffisance rénale, TRR urgente dans les cas d'insuffisance rénale aiguë (IRA), et biopsie du rein (BxR). Objectifs: Adapter l'ECOS à une plateforme virtuelle, simuler des rencontres de télémédecine impliquant des conversations difficiles avec des patients en néphrologie, et évaluer la satisfaction des résidents en néphrologie et du corps enseignant à l'égard du format virtuel. Conception: Description d'une simulation de télémédecine pour la formation des résidents en néphrologie. Cadre: Des simulations entièrement virtuelles réalisées dans deux centers universitaires de simulation médicale. Participants: Les professeurs et les résidents en néphrologie de trois programs de formation urbains/suburbains de l'est des États-Unis. Mesures: Description du processus de l'ECOS virtuel. Satisfaction générale des résidents en néphrologie et du corps enseignant pour chacun des scénarios. Estimation, par les professeurs et les résidents, de la fréquence des rencontres virtuelles avec des patients au cours de la dernière année. Méthodologie: L'ECOS était composé de trois scénarios: TRR en insuffisance rénale; TRR urgente en contexte d'IRA et biopsie rénale. Les ECOS ont été réalisés en mai 2021. Chaque scénario durait 20 minutes. Le scénario IRA était audio uniquement; les boursiers devaient téléphoner à un patient simulé afin d'obtenir un consentement pour une TRR urgente. Les scénarios pour l'insuffisance rénale terminale et la BxR étaient sous forme de rencontres vidéo. Les professeurs observaient les scénarios en sourdine/hors vidéo. Immédiatement après l'ECOS, les résidents en néphrologie et les professeurs ont été interrogés de façon anonyme sur leur satisfaction à l'égard de chaque scénario et de l'ECOS dans son ensemble. Ils ont également été invités à estimer le nombre de consultations externes et de conseils prodigués sur la TRR à des patients hospitalisés au cours de l'année précédente. Résultats: Dix-sept résidents en néphrologie ont complété l'ECOS dans les deux centers (trois programs) et seize (94 %) ont répondu au sondage. La très grande majorité (94 %) a évalué l'ECOS comme une bonne/très bonne simulation des rencontres de télémédecine. Le taux de personnes satisfaites/très satisfaites s'établissait à 100 % pour le scénario de l'IRA, à 75 % pour celui de l'insuffisance rénale terminale et à 75 % pour celui de la BxR. Deux personnes ont dit faire régulièrement des consultations par téléphone pour la TRR urgente. Les résidents en néphrologie ont estimé que 20 %, (proportion médiane) ÉIQ= 175; 50 %, des consultations avec des patients hospitalisés et 50 %, (proportion médiane) ÉIQ = 33,75; 70 %, des consultations externes avaient été faites virtuellement au cours de l'année précédente. Pour les scénarios d'insuffisance rénale terminale et de BxR, deux personnes ont indiqué qu'elles ne feraient pas de consultations virtuelles pour ces patients. Limites: Les interactions de 15 minutes sont probablement trop courtes pour compléter confortablement la rencontre. Un faible nombre de programs et de résidents en néphrologie ont participé. Les programs évalués se situaient en zones urbaines et suburbaines de la côte est des États-Unis. Conclusion: Dans l'ensemble, les résidents en néphrologie ont estimé que l'ECOS était une bonne représentation des rencontres virtuelles. L'ECOS est une occasion pour les résidents de mettre en pratique leurs compétences en communication dans un contexte de télémédecine.
ABSTRACT
A patient admitted to the ICU with shock and acute kidney injury required continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). CRRT was initiated using regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) with an initial magnesium (Mg) level of 1.7 mg/dL. Over 12 days the patient received 68 g of Mg sulfate. After 58 g the patient's Mg level was 1.4 mg/dL. On day 13, CRRT was changed to a heparin circuit from concerns of citrate toxicity. Over the next 7 days the patient required no Mg replacement with a mean Mg level of 2.22. This was significantly higher than the final 7 days on RCA (1.99; P = .00069). This case illustrates the challenges in maintaining Mg stores during CRRT. RCA is now the preferred method of circuit anticoagulation, with prolonged filter life and fewer bleeding complication compared to heparin circuits. Citrate inhibits coagulation within the circuit by chelating ionized calcium (Ca2+). Free Ca2+ and Ca-citrate complexes diffuse across the hemofilter with a percentual calcium loss as high as 70%, requiring continuous post-filter infusions of calcium to prevent systemic hypocalcemia. Magnesium loss during CRRT is also significant and may approach 15% to 20% of the total body pool within a week. Citrate chelates Mg with percentual losses comparable to calcium. Twenty-two CRRT patients on RCA had median losses >6 g/day. Doubling the Mg content in the dialyzate of 45 CRRT patients significantly improved Mg balance, but with the potential risk of increased citrate toxicity. A major obstacle to replacing Magnesium loss with the same precision as calcium is few hospitals can measure ionized Mg++ levels and must rely on total magnesium levels to guide replacement, despite a literature showing poor correlation with total body stores. Post-circuit continuous replacement of magnesium, as with calcium, in the absence of ionized magnesium levels would likely be very inexact and arduous. Being aware of the losses that can occur with CRRT, especially with RCA, and adjusting magnesium replacement empirically on rounds may be the only pragmatic action plan for this clinical issue.
ABSTRACT
Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, psychological support was provided to healthcare workers in Nephrology and Dialysis Operative Unit of the Azienda Ospedaliera Bassini using an EMDR group protocol to decrease posttraumatic stress symptoms in the medium and long term. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the effectiveness of EMDR treatment to reduce post-traumatic stress symptoms at the end of the first pandemic wave and its progress over time in the subsequent phases of the health emergency. Methods: The sample of study consisted of 43 healthcare workers from the Nephrology and Dialysis Service who spontaneously decided to take part in the Brief EMDR treatment. Statistical analyses were carried out to compare the data collected with the IES-R, the Emotion Thermometer and the Post-Traumatic Growth Scale. The comparisons covered pre-treatment, post-treatment and follow-up. Results: The results show a significant clinical improvement in reducing PTSD symptoms following the Brief EMDR group treatment. The comparison between PRE and POST treatment (DELTA1) regarding the scores from IES-R and Emotion Thermometer, highlighted the important statistically change that occurred in terms of symptomatology reduction (p < 0.001). By comparing POST and FU (DELTA2), it was observed that all variables except avoidance show a significant weakening of the effect with time (p < 0.001), but the magnitude of this effect is much smaller than the improvement found in DELTA1. DELTA 3 analysis finally made it possible to highlight how the treatment effect is maintained almost intact at follow-up. In fact, the maintenance of a better situation at follow-up was observed, in the course of re-traumatization linked to the new wave, compared to the initial data (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The COVID-19 health emergency has significantly impacted hospital healthcare workers, leading to a high risk of developing PTSD symptoms. A psychological intervention aimed at the operators themselves is therefore of great importance.
ABSTRACT
Purpose of Review: Compared with high-income countries, healthcare disparities and inequities are more evident in low, lower-middle, and upper-middle-income countries with poorer housing and nutrition conditions. At least 20% of Latin America and the Caribbean are low and lower-middle-income countries. Despite the majority of the other countries being upper-middle income, the United Nations Children's Fund had classified all the regions as "less developed," with limited access to health care for the most vulnerable, the children. Latin America and the Caribbean regions represent an extensive territory with communication limitations and an unstable socio-political and economic environment. After considering the vast population affected by poverty worldwide and the long-term impact of kidney disease starting in childhood, it is crucial to better understand and analyze the multifactorial limiting conditions in accessing specialized care such as pediatric nephrology in disadvantaged areas. Recent Findings: Constraints in accessing basic healthcare in rural areas make it impossible to receive specialized pediatric nephrology care including dialysis and transplantation. Disturbingly, incidence and prevalence figures of acute kidney injury, chronic and end-stage kidney disease in some Latin American and the Caribbean countries are unknown, and these conditions still represent a death sentence for underprivileged populations. However, the monumental efforts of the dedicated healthcare providers and stakeholders that pioneered the actions in the past 50 years have shown remarkable progress in developing pediatric nephology services across the continent. Summary: In this review, we compile some of the latest evidence about the care of children and adolescents with kidney conditions in Latin America and the Caribbean, along with the experiences from the field in the care of these patients facing adverse conditions. We also highlight recommendations to address inequities and disparities.
ABSTRACT
Background: Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) experienced reduced SARS-CoV-2 vaccine response and were at increased risk of severe COVID-19. It is unknown if level of vaccine induced anti-receptor binding domain IgG (anti-RBD IgG) correlates with protection from and survival following COVID-19. We aimed to evaluate the effect of vaccine response on risk of breakthrough infections (BTI) and COVID-19 death in KTRs. Methods: We performed a nationwide study, examining the competing risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 related/unrelated death, and vaccine efficacy as assessed by level of anti-RBD IgG response 4-10 weeks after each vaccination. The study included all KTR in Norway alive and with a functioning graft on February 20th, 2020, and events after November 11th, 2022 were right-censored. A pre-pandemic reference-cohort from January 1st 2019 to January 1st 2020 was included to evaluate excess mortality. The study was conducted at Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Norway. Findings: The study included 3607 KTRs (59 [48-70] years) with a functioning graft at February 20th, 2020, who received (median [IQR]) 4 [3-4] vaccines (range 2-6, 99% mRNA). Anti-RBD IgG was measured in 12 701 serum samples provided by 3213 KTRs. Vaccine response was assessed 41 [31-57] days after vaccination. A total of 1090 KTRs were infected with SARS-CoV-2, 1005 (92%) were BTI, and vaccine response did not protect against BTI. The hazard ratio for COVID-19 related death 40 days post-infection was 1.71 (95% CI: 1.14, 2.56) comparing vaccine response levels (≥5 vs. ≥5000 BAU/mL). No excess non-COVID-19 mortality was registered in KTRs surviving SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to a 2019 pre-pandemic reference. Interpretation: Our findings suggested that SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine response did not predict protection against infection, but prevention of fatal disease progression in KTRs and greater vaccine response further reduced the risk of COVID-19 death. No excess non-COVID-19 mortality was seen during the pandemic. Funding: CEPI and internal funds.
ABSTRACT
This book provides an update on recent clinical practice and an in-depth view of selected topics relevant to hospital medicine. It is divided into four sections that explore clinical, administrative, systems and ethical issues. Each section places an emphasis on the opportunities, challenges and potential directions of this bourgeoning subspecialty. This new edition expands on topics covered in the previous edition, including the COVID-19 pandemic, racial disparities in healthcare delivery and providers, and pediatric hospital medicine. Other chapters explore worldwide practice patterns and practical application of philosophical tools in daily practice. This up-to-date resource provides hospitalists, advanced nurse practitioners, medical students and administrators with the latest research, trends and issues in hospital medicine. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the sociodemographic and psychological factors influencing the continuity of treatment of patients with chronic kidney disease under the regular epidemic prevention and control of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods A total of 277 patients with chronic kidney disease who were admitted to Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University) from Apr. 2020 to Mar. 2021 were enrolled and divided into 3 groups: non-dialysis group (n=102), hemodialysis (HD) group (n=108), and peritoneal dialysis (PD) group (n=67). All patients were investigated by online and offline questionnaires, including self-designed basic situation questionnaire, self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), and self-rating depression scale (SDS). The general sociodemographic data, anxiety and depression of the 3 groups were compared, and the influence of sociodemographic and psychological factors on the interruption or delay of treatment was analyzed by binary logistic regression model. Results There were significant differences in age distribution, marital status, occupation, medical insurance type, caregiver type, whether there was an urgent need for hospitalization and whether treatment was delayed or interrupted among the 3 groups (all P<0.05). The average SAS score of 65 PD patients was 38.15+/-15.83, including 53 (81.5%) patients without anxiety, 7 (10.8%) patients with mild anxiety, and 5 (7.7%) patients with moderate to severe anxiety. The average SAS score of 104 patients in the HD group was 36.86+/-14.03, including 81 (77.9%) patients without anxiety, 18 (17.3%) patients with mild anxiety, and 5 (4.8%) patients with moderate to severe anxiety. There were no significant differences in the mean score of SAS or anxiety severity grading between the 2 groups (both P>0.05). The mean SDS scores of 65 PD patients were 53.42+/-13.30, including 22 (33.8%) patients without depression, 21 (32.3%) patients with mild depression, and 22 (33.8%) patients with moderate to severe depression. The mean SDS scores of 104 patients in the HD group were 50.79+/-10.76, including 36 (34.6%) patients without depression, 56 (53.8%) patients with mild depression, and 12 (11.6%) patients with moderate to severe depression. There were no significant differences in mean SDS scores or depression severity grading between the 2 groups (both P>0.05). The results of intra-group comparison showed that the incidence and severity of depression were higher than those of anxiety in both groups. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis showed that high school education level (odds ratio [OR]=5.618, 95% confidence interval [CI]) 2.136-14.776, P<0.01), and unmarried (OR=6.916, 95% CI 1.441-33.185, P=0.016), divorced (OR= 5.588, 95% CI 1.442-21.664, P=0.013), urgent need for hospitalization (OR=8.655, 95% CI 3.847-19.476, P<0.01) could positively promote the continuity of treatment in maintenance dialysis patients under the regular epidemic prevention and control of COVID-19. In the non-dialysis group, no sociodemographic and psychological factors were found to be associated with the interruption or delay of treatment (P>0.05). Conclusion Education, marital status, and urgent need for hospitalization are correlated with the continuity of treatment in patients with chronic kidney disease on maintenance dialysis.Copyright © 2022, Second Military Medical University Press. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Mucormycosis is a life-threatening infection, especially seen in individuals with diabetes mellitus and immunosuppression, in which the vast majority of cases result in death. Early diagnosis is vital for treatment. Coronavirus disease 2019 infection can also lead to the development of mucormycosis infection. Only few cases have been reported in the literature. A 35-year-old kidney transplant patient was hospitalized for coronavirus disease 2019 infection with lung involvement and was further examined upon complaint of headache and visual impairment during follow-up, which was later diagnosed as mucormycosis infection. The patient died despite the initiation of emergent surgical debridement and amphotericin B therapy. © 2023 Turkish Society of Nephrology. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
The course of the COVID-19 pandemic has led to a critical increase in the burden on virtually all major branches of the health care system in our country and abroad. The aim of this article is to analyse the activities of the different parts of the city nephrology service in Saint-Petersburg and to consider promising ways to improve it. The nephrology service for the adult population in St. Petersburg includes: outpatient service;inpatient service - 183 beds in 24-hour inpatient departments of the city;dialysis service - 10 dialysis units in municipal medical organizations, 5 in federal institutions, and 8 centers/departments operating in the framework of private-public partnership. The number of patients on dialysis programme decreased by 10.5 % to 1,839 in 2021. These changes are likely due to an increase in mortality among these patients in 2020 and 2021 which is a consequence not only of COVID-19 but also of the adverse impact of the pandemic on the health system. The proportion of patients treated as outpatients in private dialysis centres increased during the three-year period. The incidence of arteriovenous fistula formation in primary vascular access decreased from 33.2 % to 14.2 % in 2020 compared with 2019. At the same time, the use of temporary central venous catheters as primary vascular access for renal replacement therapy has increased significantly from 43.0 % to 61.9 %. The development of the nephrology service is largely determined by its funding. To compensate the costs of medical institutions in the city for conducting renal replacement therapy it is necessary to increase the tariffs of compulsory health insurance (CHI) by at least 50 %. In the medical organizations of Saint-Petersburg municipal and federal subordination the share of "artificial kidney" devices that have used up their resource is 32.2 %, and in a number of medical institutions it exceeds 50 %. © 2023 The Author(s).
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, new policy waivers permitted reimbursement of telehealth services in urban settings. The aim of this study was to assess patient satisfaction with telehealth services during the COVID-19 pandemic in an outpatient urban nephrology practice. METHODS: Patients who had virtual encounters were asked to complete an online survey regarding their experiences with telehealth services. RESULTS: Twenty-one percent of eligible patients completed the survey. Patients (83.6%) reported overall positive experiences with telehealth and want to see a hybrid healthcare model in the future (80.1%). Additionally, most patients found telehealth appointments convenient to make and telehealth encounters convenient to conduct. Ethnicity, age, gender, and insurance type did not have a statistically significant impact on satisfaction ratings. Technical issues were not encountered by 79.5% of patients and patients were willing to use the video feature. However, if they had technical issues, patient satisfaction ratings were negatively impacted. CONCLUSION: Telehealth services are beneficial to patients with regards to convenience, decreased transportation costs and time, increased accessibility to healthcare, and decreased overall opportunity costs. However, challenges still remain with the deployment of telehealth and will be dependent on patients' digital health literacy, access to broadband internet and devices, and legislation and/or regulations. Limitations of the study, including small sample size and surveying patients from a nephrology practice, may prevent it from being generalizable. Additional studies with a larger sample size and multiple specialties may be needed to generalize patients' satisfaction with telehealth services.
ABSTRACT
A 14-year-old boy with movement disorder and epilepsy developed status dystonicus leading to rhabdomyolysis and subsequent acute kidney injury requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). He was given multiple intravenous sedatives and analgesics to control his dystonia and dyskinesia. 8 days after admission, his condition had improved and a trial termination of CRRT was carried out. The sedatives and analgesics were switched to oral diazepam, morphine, clonidine, and chloral hydrate. However, his renal function did not recover fully. There was rising trend of serum creatinine level with evolving hyperphosphatemia and metabolic acidosis. He also gradually developed hypoventilation, hypercapnia and pinpoint pupils after weaning CRRT. The clinical impression was over-sedation resulting in hypoventilation and respiratory failure, contributed by the deteriorating renal function. Non-invasive ventilatory support was then started and CRRT was resumed. His condition improved over the next 24 hours. Dexmedetomidine infusion was used during CRRT and he slowly required stepping up of sedatives again. A separate set of dosage for all his oral sedative agents was prepared for his subsequent CRRT weaning challenge and no more over-sedative episode was then encountered. Our case illustrated that patients at recovery phase of AKI are susceptible to medication overdose, especially during the period of CRRT weaning. Sedatives and analgesics including morphine and benzodiazepines should be used with caution during this period and alternatives may need to be considered. Advanced planning of medication dosage adjustment is advised to reduce the risk of medication overdose.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Data on humoral immune response to standard COVID-19 vaccination are scarce in adolescent patients and lacking for children below 12 years of age with chronic kidney disease including kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: We therefore investigated in this retrospective two-center study (DRKS00024668; registered 23.03.2021) the humoral immune response to a standard two-dose mRNA vaccine regimen in 123 CKD patients aged 5-30 years. A live-virus assay was used to assess the serum neutralizing activity against the SARS-CoV-2 omicron (BA.1) variant. RESULTS: Children aged 5-11 years had a comparable rate and degree of immune response to adolescents despite lower vaccine doses (10 µg vs. 30 µg BNT162b2). Treatment with two (odds ratio 9.24) or three or more (odds ratio 17.07) immunosuppressants was an independent risk factor for nonresponse. The immune response differed significantly among three patient cohorts: 48 of 77 (62.3%) kidney transplant recipients, 21 of 26 (80.8%) patients on immunosuppressive therapy, and 19 of 20 (95.0%) patients with chronic kidney disease without immunosuppressive therapy responded. In the kidney transplant recipients, immunosuppressive regimens comprising mycophenolate mofetil, an eGFR of < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, and female sex were independent risk factors for nonresponse. Two of 18 (11.1%) and 8 of 16 (50.0%) patients with an anti-S1-RBD IgG of 100-1411 and > 1411 BAU/mL, respectively, showed a neutralization activity against the omicron variant. CONCLUSION: A standard mRNA vaccine regimen in immunosuppressed children and adolescents with kidney disease elicits an attenuated humoral immune response with effective live virus neutralization against the omicron variant in approximately 10% of the patients, underlying the need for omicron-adapted vaccination. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Rhabdomyolysis, the breakdown of skeletal muscles following an insult or injury, has been established as a possible complication of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Despite being highly effective in preventing COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality, several cases of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination-induced rhabdomyolysis have been identified. We provide the second description of a pediatric case of severe rhabdomyolysis presenting after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. CASE: DIAGNOSIS/TREATMENT: A 16-year-old male reported to the emergency department with a 2-day history of bilateral upper extremity myalgias and dark urine 2 days after his first dose of COVID-19 vaccine (Pfizer-BioNtech). The initial blood work showed an elevated creatinine kinase (CK) of 141,300 units/L and a normal creatinine of 69 umol/L. The urinalysis was suggestive of myoglobinuria, with the microscopy revealing blood but no red blood cells. Rhabdomyolysis was diagnosed, and the patient was admitted for intravenous hydration, alkalinization of urine, and monitoring of kidney function. CK levels declined with supportive care, while his kidney function remained normal, and no electrolyte abnormalities developed. The patient was discharged 5 days after admission as his symptoms resolved. CONCLUSION: While vaccination is the safest and most effective way to prevent morbidity from COVID-19, clinicians should be aware that rhabdomyolysis could be a rare but treatable adverse event of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. With early recognition and diagnosis and supportive management, rhabdomyolysis has an excellent prognosis.
ABSTRACT
Background: The global burden of persistent COVID-19 in hemodialysis (HD) patients is a worrisome scenario worth of investigation for the critical care of chronic kidney disease (CKD). We performed an exploratory post-hoc study from the trial U1111-1237-8231 with two specific aims: i) to investigate the prevalence of COVID-19 infection and long COVID symptoms from our Cohort of 178 Brazilians HD patients. ii) to identify whether baseline characteristics should predict long COVID in this sample. Methods: 247 community-dwelling older (>60 years) patients (Men and women) undergoing HD (glomerular filtration rate < 15 mL/min/1.73m2) with arteriovenous fistula volunteered for this study. All patients presented hypertension and diabetes. Patients were divided in two groups: without long-COVID and with long-COVID. Body composition, handgrip strength, functional performance, iron metabolism, phosphate, and inflammatory profile were assessed. Patients were screened for 11-months after COVID-19 infection. Results were considered significant at P < 0.05. Results: We found that more than 85% of the COVID-19 infected patients presented a severe condition during the infection. In our sample, the mortality rate over 11-month follow was relatively low (8.4%) when compared to worldwide (approximately 36%). Long COVID was highly prevalent in COVID-19 survivors representing more than 80% of all cases. Phosphate and IL-10 were higher in the long COVID group, but only phosphate higher than 5.35 mg/dL appears to present an increased prevalence of long COVID, dyspnea, and fatigue. Conclusion: There was a high prevalence of COVID-19 infection and long COVID in HD patients from the Brazilian trial 'U1111-1237-8231'. HD clinics should be aware with phosphate range in HD patients as a possible target for adverse post-COVID events.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Brazil/epidemiology , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Hand Strength , Humans , Interleukin-10 , Iron , Male , Phosphates , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects , Renal Dialysis/methods , Post-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To establish barriers and motivators underlying research engagement among early-career practitioners in nephrology across the UK, in order to guide potential interventions to enhance research involvement in renal units. DESIGN: Cross-sectional online survey employing a range of free-text, Likert scale and binomial/multiple-choice responses, distributed via mailing lists and social media. Topics covered research experience, research involvement and barriers, impact of COVID-19 and strategies to improve research engagement. Thematic analysis was used to assess free-text responses. SETTING: Renal units throughout the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Non-consultant healthcare staff self-identifying as working in nephrology were included (n=211), with responses from non-UK respondents or consultant nephrologists excluded (n=12). RESULTS: Responses were received from across the multidisciplinary team (physicians (n=83) and nurses (n=83)) and other allied health professionals (n=45). Most were aware of ongoing local research, but under half of them were actively involved. Multivariate analysis indicated employment as a physician, protected time for research activity and provision of appropriate training were associated with greater research experience and output. There was general enthusiasm to undertake research, but perceived barriers included insufficient staffing, lack of time, funding and encouragement. COVID-19 was felt to have further impacted negatively upon opportunities. Among the suggested strategies to promote engagement, mentorship and an online research resource were felt to be of most interest. CONCLUSIONS: In the first survey of this type in nephrology, we demonstrate differences across the multidisciplinary spectrum in perceived research experience and accessibility, which have been worsened by COVID-19. Our findings will guide strategies to broaden engagement in early-career practitioners and serve as a baseline to assess the impact of these interventions.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Nephrology , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , NephrologistsABSTRACT
The intensive care medicine literature continued to resonate with the fading COVID-19 pandemic in 2022. Nevertheless, several interesting scientific publications have appeared in the field of critical care nephrology, the contents of which are worth mentioning. This summary article aims to guide the reader through the most fundamental aspects of nephrotoxicity, acute kidney injury, and extracorporeal purification methods.Copyright © 2022, Czech Medical Association J.E. Purkyne. All rights reserved.